|
|
who
we are and
how to reach us |
|
what
we study |
|
download
our publications |
|
courses
we offer |
|
recent
work from our group |
|
|
|
|
Global climate research
What controls the mean depth of the planetary
boundary layer?
The depth of the planetary boundary layer (PBL) is a
climatologically important quantity that has received little
attention on regional to global scales. In this study a 10-yr
climatology of PBL depth from the UCLA
atmospheric GCM is analyzed using the PBL mass budget.
This GCM is particularly useful for PBL studies because it goes
to extraordinary lengths to consistently couple the budgets of
mass, heat, and moisture between the PBL and the free
troposphere. Using the PBL mass budget allows processes
affecting PBL depth to be separated. Based on the dominant
physical processes, several PBL regimes are identified. The most
common regimes are stratocumulus-topped boundary layers, dry
convective boundary layers over land, stable boundary layers,
and shallow boundary layers associated with deep convection.
These regimes exhibit large-scale geographic organization.
Locally generated buoyancy fluxes and static stability control
PBLdepth nearly everywhere, though convective mass flux has a
large influence at tropical marine locations. Virtually all
geographical variability in PBL depth can be linearly related to
these quantities. While dry convective boundary layers dominate
over land, stratocumulus-topped boundary layers are most common
over ocean. This division of regimes leads to a dramatic
land-sea contrast in PBL depth, evident in this
figure showing the 10-year mean PBL depth from the
simulation. Aside from the difference between land and ocean,
there are also regions of deep PBL over eastern ocean basins,
which are coincident with stratocumulus regions. High latitudes
are dominated by the frigid surface conditions, leading to a
relatively persistent shallow stable boundary layer.
Diurnal effects keep mean PBL depth over land shallow despite
large daytime surface fluxes. The daily development of a deep
convective boundary layer and its subsequent collapse to a
nocturnal stable boundary layer leads to significant daily
exchange of heat and mass between the PBL and free troposphere
for most land locations. This diurnal cycle is absent over the
ocean, where mixing is accomplished by turbulent entrainment.
Employing a simple model of the convective boundary layer, we
show that consistent treatment of remnant air from the deep
daytime PBL is necessary for proper representation of the
diurnal behavior over land.
To illustrate the differences in PBL regimes, this
figure shows a scatterplot of PBL depth and buoyancy flux
with points color-coded by (a) cumulus mass flux, (b) stability
of the lower troposphere, and (c) incidence of stratus clouds.
The figure separates land and ocean points, since diurnal
variation makes the distributions very different. Some PBL
regimes are clearly evident here. For example, tropical ocean
locations are characterized by relatively shallow PBL with low
mean buoyancy fluxes and high convective mass flux. Also evident
are high-latitude marine locations, dominated by shallow
boundary layers and small buoyancy flux (red and orange points
in (b)). Stratus-topped PBLs have a range of depths, but
generally have substantial buoyancy fluxes, driven mostly by
cloud-top cooling. Many locations, both land and ocean, also
exhibit seasonal shifts in PBL regime related to changes in PBL
clouds. These shifts are controlled by seasonal variations in
buoyancy flux and static stability. Seasonal variations in PBL
regime contribute significantly to the spread of the mean
characteristics shown in the scatterplot.
Using the PBL mass budget separately for ocean and land
locations and investigating diurnal and seasonal variations in
PBL depth, an understanding of the spatial distribution of PBL
depth is reached. This analysis takes a global perspective,
anticipating global PBL datasets providing sufficient
information for a similar analysis, which could be useful for
understanding the PBL and its role in climate as well as
comparison with other climate models.
Download
the publication (Medeiros et al. 2005) describing these results
in more detail.
Brian Medeiros,
Alex Hall, and Bjorn
Stevens make up the team that performed this research.
|
|